<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Numbers juggling statistics - ! Jugglers - tribe.net</title>
    <link>http://jugglenet.tribe.net/thread/c3bf6837-8ca1-44e5-a7c0-7459fa5c07d3?format=rss</link>
    <description>Tribe.net. Local Connections</description>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Numbers juggling statistics</title>
      <link>http://jugglenet.tribe.net/thread/c3bf6837-8ca1-44e5-a7c0-7459fa5c07d3#7a329fc2-8e32-4930-b028-27a02198e55f</link>
      <description>Several people/groups (including me) have set up sites and web pages to record this kind of thing, but the only reasonably reliable ones are for the most catches for a given number of a given prop.  Ben may still run it, or not.  &#xD;
&#xD;
I belive JAG, Steve Healy, had a site that collected the names of 5, 6, 7, etc -club, ring, and ball/bag jugglers, but it was entirely dependent on people reporting to him.  That's a crappy way to collect statistics, but nobody's thought of a better one. &#xD;
&#xD;
Just guessing?  I'd say 42 people juggle more now than then.   &#xD;
&#xD;
(Prove me wrong.)</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 05:29:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://jugglenet.tribe.net/thread/c3bf6837-8ca1-44e5-a7c0-7459fa5c07d3#7a329fc2-8e32-4930-b028-27a02198e55f</guid>
      <dc:creator>=Eric</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-12-22T05:29:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Numbers juggling statistics</title>
      <link>http://jugglenet.tribe.net/thread/c3bf6837-8ca1-44e5-a7c0-7459fa5c07d3#f2fa5042-17e3-484b-b578-b51107c0363f</link>
      <description>Has anybody ever compiled statistical estimates of how many people can qualify x number of balls?  I assume there are not too many people hiding in the woodwork who can do nine, so it could probably be determined how many there are.  But what about eight, or seven?  If I had to guess, I would say maybe a few hundred or a thousand people can do seven, but I don't really know.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 03:59:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://jugglenet.tribe.net/thread/c3bf6837-8ca1-44e5-a7c0-7459fa5c07d3#f2fa5042-17e3-484b-b578-b51107c0363f</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-12-22T03:59:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>



